Market Overview
Brent traded in the mid-$90s through Week 35, with CFD pricing indicated at $94.39/bbl on 21 August 2026, according to Trading Economics-referenced benchmarks. Market sentiment remained sensitive to conflicting US–Iran signals and reported plans for tougher US sanctions on Tehran, while disruption concerns around Russian refining and export infrastructure continued to support geopolitical risk premia. Despite elevated conflict risk, reported Gulf export flows remained substantially operational, limiting the immediate physical supply impact of the regional tensions. At the same time, stronger middle-distillate pricing and continued concerns around Russian and Iranian-linked cargoes reinforced the importance of both physical availability and sanctions-related compliance in prompt trading decisions.
Week 35 at a Glance
- Brent: CFD pricing indicated at $94.39/bbl on 21 August, with the benchmark remaining in the mid-$90s.
- Risk Premium: US–Iran uncertainty and potential sanctions escalation continued to support geopolitical risk premia.
- Products: Heating oil gained 8.34% M/M and 94.74% Y/Y, while gasoline remained 55.17% above year-ago levels.
- Physical Markets: EN590 and other diesel grades remained the most frequently requested products across Skyra CIP RFQs.
- Compliance: Origin verification, sanctions screening and documentation checks increased around Russian- and Iranian-linked cargoes.
- Logistics: Gulf export flows remained substantially operational, but Hormuz exposure continued to influence routing and freight assumptions.
Market Performance Snapshot — Week 35
| Market Indicator | Weekly Trend | Market Read-through |
|---|---|---|
| Brent Price | $94.39/bbl on 21 Aug | Mid-$90s risk-premium environment |
| Brent M/M | +0.34% | Broadly stable on the month |
| Brent Y/Y | ~+40% | Significantly above year-ago levels |
| Heating Oil | Firm | +8.34% M/M; +94.74% Y/Y |
| Gasoline | Firm Y/Y | +55.17% Y/Y |
| EN590 RFQs | High | Strong middle-distillate enquiry |
| Origin / Sanctions Checks | Elevated | Greater scrutiny of Russian/Iranian-linked cargoes |
| Hormuz Risk | Elevated | Routing and freight optionality remain important |
Key Market Themes — Week 35
Macro – Iran Risk, Sanctions and Brent Risk Premium
Brent remained supported in the mid-$90s as US–Iran tensions continued to generate conflicting signals. Iranian statements suggesting openness to de-escalation contrasted with US signals pointing towards a potentially tougher sanctions campaign against Tehran.
Market discussions also continued to focus on reported Ukrainian attacks affecting Russian refineries and port infrastructure. The combination of sanctions uncertainty, regional conflict risk and potential disruption to Russian energy flows has helped sustain a geopolitical premium in Brent benchmarks.
Products – Middle-Distillate Strength and Crack Support
Related product benchmarks showed heating oil up 8.34% M/M and 94.74% Y/Y, while gasoline remained 55.17% above year-ago levels. The relative pricing pattern was consistent with continued support for middle-distillate and light-end cracks against a substantially higher crude backdrop.
Physical trading discussions remained particularly focused on EN590 and jet fuel, with buyers continuing to reference elevated replacement costs and firm diesel-range economics. The combination of higher crude prices and concerns over potential refining disruptions continued to support prompt distillate pricing.
Physical Flows – EN590 and Middle East–West of Suez Corridors
Skyra CIP enquiry activity during Week 35 continued to centre on EN590 and other diesel grades, with RFQs frequently referencing Middle East and CIS origins into West Africa and Mediterranean discharge options.
Platform interactions indicated increased attention to origin verification, sanctions screening and documentation checks for cargoes potentially linked to Russian and Iranian flows. The pattern suggests that compliance and provenance are becoming increasingly important alongside price and physical availability in prompt diesel and fuel-oil transactions.
Logistics – Hormuz Transit and Regional Routing Adjustments
US military statements indicated that more than 660 million barrels of crude had transited the Strait of Hormuz since early May, suggesting that core Gulf export flows have remained substantially operational despite elevated conflict risk.
At the same time, Skyra CIP users reported continued use of alternative routing and laycan flexibility around Hormuz and adjacent chokepoints. Charterers have continued to factor longer transit assumptions, contingency options and additional freight exposure into routing and demurrage discussions.
The result is a market in which physical flows remain operational, but the cost and risk of moving those barrels remain elevated.
Near-term Outlook
The key market question for the coming week is whether Brent can remain supported in the mid-$90s without a material deterioration in physical Gulf flows.
A further escalation in US–Iran tensions, additional sanctions affecting Iranian or Russian energy exports, or renewed attacks on refining and export infrastructure could extend the current risk premium and provide further upside to crude and middle-distillate prices.
Conversely, credible de-escalation signals, continued uninterrupted Gulf exports or easing sanctions expectations could reduce the geopolitical premium and leave Brent more exposed to underlying demand-growth concerns.
For physical participants, prompt availability, provenance, sanctions compliance, route optionality and counterparty resilience are therefore likely to remain central considerations alongside outright crude price direction.
Published: Monday, 24 August 2026 at 00:03 HKT
Active Verified RFQs — Week 35
The following deals were active on the Skyra CIP marketplace during 17–23 August 2026. All participants have completed KYC verification.
Osaka
Piraeus
London
Rotterdam
Mumbai
New York
Shandong
Dubai
Antwerp
Hamburg
AliağaSee also: EN590 price · Jet A-1 price · Bunker fuel price · Brent crude price
Disclaimer: The information contained in this publication is provided for informational and general market intelligence purposes only. It does not constitute, and should not be construed as, financial, investment, legal, or professional advice of any kind, nor a solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any commodity, security, or financial instrument. Past price movements and deal flow patterns referenced herein are not indicative of future results. Skyra CIP makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the information provided. Readers should conduct their own due diligence and consult qualified professional advisers before making any commercial or investment decision. Skyra CIP and its affiliates accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the contents of this publication.